1. “I only know I’ve changed”: Luis Bunuel’s ‘Viridiana’

    Copyright © 2011 by James Clark

          For quite a while, I’ve been jockeying into position one of my favorite films, Woman in the Dunes (1964), whose guiding light (along with novelist and scriptwriter, Kobo Abe), namely, Hiroshi Teshigahara, has occupied some of my daydreams due to his abandoning film in favor of  flower arrangement, ikebana. That vocation seems very near to actress, Setsuko Hara’s abandoning film just after Yasujiro Ozu’s death, for life in a meditative retreat. These trajectories have a way of haunting us, in view of the unforgiving weight of social misalliance. Teshigahara’s film, however, could be seen as entailing a strange rejoinder to such quietism.

        But Woman in the Dunes has many strikes against it as a communicative vehicle. It’s (that word) “slow.” It’s claustrophobic. Few have seen it. And still fewer have cared for its eerie illuminations in a super-strange Beast’s lair. Therefore, I’m broaching this tight squeeze by way of a pair of raucous and flashy soulmates to that quiet little gem (namely, Bunuel’s The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie and the Coens’ A Serious Man), in hopes that their raging entropy will pave a way toward countering their suspicious helplessness. Just prior to that, however, we need to do a bit more grading of the Surrealist Inter-State to ensure that subsequent apparent strays more clearly take their bearings from the imperative—memorably keyed by Cocteau’s Beauty and the Beast—of cogent interpersonal motion. Louis Bunuel’s Viridiana (1961) and Tristana (1970) transmit with gratifying transparency the “Pitfalls” (an alternate title for Woman in the Dunes) of maintaining that dynamic route in a state of perpetual waylaying of its uncanny prospects. But, in one of those cases at least, there is intriguing traction, necessitating one further twist to this preamble that may seem to be inspired by Laurence Sterne’s eighteenth-century novel Tristram Shandy.

    Read More

     
  2. Nov 23rd, 2011      luis bunuel
  3. “I wonder what goes on in there”: Luis Bunuel’s ‘Belle De Jour”

    Copyright © 2011 by James Clark

        This Catherine Deneuve vehicle, from the same year (1967) as The Young Girls of Rochefort, bristles with infusions from the history of modern thought (particularly Surrealism) and from the history of modern film (particularly Cocteau’s Belle et Bête, Godard’s Breathless and the omnipresent [in French cinema at that period] Kiss Me Deadly). However, to bring some apt tuning to this flurry of disparate visitors, we have to keep our eyes primarily upon Deneuve’s “Severine” as subjecting herself to a spectacular and consequential metamorphosis. As such, the film poses a turning point (easily underestimated) consisting of Severine’s coming upon an acquaintance, “Henriette,” at their tony tennis club. Severine had heard from a friend that Henriette, far from cash-strapped, had begun working as a prostitute, and she herself (married to a wealthy physician) was seen to carefully ponder such a choice of give-and-take activity. (Coming from the courts into the facility, she remarks, “I can’t hit one ball today!”) On showing some interest in having Henriette stop for a while, Severine presents an almost adolescent disarray, rendered more conspicuous by the other woman’s poise in addressing her and moving on. I think that scene offers an opportunity to fix upon the dynamics of her story, and thereby not to succumb to the rampant psychobabble this work tends to elicit.

    Read More

     
  4. Nov 9th, 2011      luis bunuel